Connect With Us

“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.

11. Maquiladoras In Silicon Valley

Source: THE NATION, Date: 4/19/93, Title: “Silicon Valley Sweatshops: High Tech’s Dirty Little Secret,” Author: Elizabeth Kadetsky

SSU Censored Researcher: Jesse Boggs

SYNOPSIS: In two high-profile visits to Silicon Valley, California’s high-tech “paradise,” President Bill Clinton has praised that industry as a model for America’s economic future, which “will move America forward to a stronger economy, a cleaner environment and techno­logical leadership.”

Unfortunately, it is a model with some poor-fitting and missing parts. In reality, Silicon Valley is home to some of the nation’s dirt­iest, most dangerous jobs-a fact that has been virtually buried in the rush to embrace our technolog­ical future.

The people who work on the assembly lines, making printed cir­cuit boards and other electronic components for companies like IBM and Digital Microwave Corporation, earn about six dollars per hour, have no health benefits, and routinely have to handle highly toxic substances without even the most rudimentary safety equip­ment, such as gloves and goggles.

If they protest their conditions, as Joselito Munoz did last October, they are fired. More than 60 per­cent of the 80,000-plus workers in this environment are female, and 70 percent of them are Asian or Latino.

A large part of the problem is that these workers aren’t actually employed by major companies like IBM or Digital Microwave. Instead, they work for small components con­tractors like Versatronex, the com­pany that fired Joselito Munoz. The week after Munoz was fired, 85 of his fellow workers walked out in protest and called the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers Union. Within a few months, the National Labor Relations Board ordered Versatronex to recognize the union. The company’s response was to file for bankruptcy and shut down its Sunnyvale plant. The message was not lost on other workers.

This is not an atypical scenario. The big Fortune 500 dynamos of Silicon Valley, whose employees enjoy flextime, elder and child care, sabbaticals, paternal leave, profit-­sharing, employee swimming pools, and fitness centers, benefit enor­mously from this system of Maquiladora-like subcontractors who can supply them with cheap parts because their wages and stan­dards are so low.

When approached about the issue, these companies take a “hands-off” attitude. When asked about conditions at companies like Versatronex, the American Elec­tronic Association’s “director of workforce excellence” responded, “We try to build consensus and not pick issues that are divisive. So we don’t have any policy statement on it.”

President Clinton, meanwhile, has laid out a plan for subsidies to small business and emerging tech­nologies that promises government windfalls to Silicon Valley-and appears destined to reinforce ­existing conditions.

In the words of University of California economist Marshall Pomer, “Insofar as he allows Silicon Valley’s desperate immigrants to work in terrible conditions with no chance of advancement and no chance of collecting disability, Clinton is furthering the Reagan agenda.”

COMMENTS: Investigative author Elizabeth Kadetsky, who wrote about the Silicon Valley sweatshops for The Nation, pointed out the critical need for local cov­erage of issues that also have a national impact.

Pointing out how the Silicon Valley has benefited enormously from its high-tech image, Kadetsky notes that “Even local newspapers have a tremendous stake in preserving Central California’s relatively newfound national promi­nence. Twenty years ago a job at the San Jose Mercury News would never have landed reporter or editor work on a top metropolitan newspaper; today and thanks expressly to high tech, the Mercury itself is one of those coveted journalistic venues.

“As in many company towns, in Silicon Valley there is a feeling of living with a Big Lie-read even the alternative press and you’ll learn a lot about big boss’s paternalism and benevolence, but nothing of his shortcomings. With boomtown boosterism so ingrained in the local psyche, it’s not surprising few have been willing to rip the curtain from this Emerald City. And without the local press’s lead, national news has nothing to steal.

“My piece went the way of many Nation stories: The New York Times ran an article within the month that was essentially a rip-off of mine-down to passages extremely reminiscent of my own wording­ of course never citing me or The Nation. Then, surprise, the Times dropped the story, failing to men­tion conditions for Silicon Valley’s immigrant workers and the persis­tence of grassroots labor organizing in the paper’s myriad encomia on Clinton’s visits and other flirtations with Silicon Valley’s Republican patrons.

“I believe negligence rather than occult machinations explains the mainstream press’s blithe omission of stories on immigrant labor. Like many Americans, a lot of journal­ists and editors are skeptical of unions and still don’t understand the difference between a don from the Carpenters Union going to jail and a barrio Chicano going out to speak Spanish with workers who could well be his or her relations. The increasingly professionalized and educated journalism establishment goes to parties where they drink white wine with other profes­sionals. In Silicon Valley at least, they come to idealize the fancy cars and beautiful homes of high-tech’s most successful entrepreneurs. The janitor from Acapulco who had a miscarriage while breathing toxic cleanser fumes is just not someone a $50,000-a-year editor cares to understand.”

Nonetheless, Kadetsky said she feels that coverage of immigrants is improving and cited several articles that recently appeared in the San Francisco Examiner, The New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times.

Facebook Comments