Connect With Us

“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.


Substantial questions of conflict of interest should be raised in connection with the July 20, 1990, decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington to void the three-count convic­tion of former White House aide Oliver North on charges stemming from the Iran-contra scan­dal. Judge Laurence H. Silberman, a member of the three judge panel that threw out the convic­tions, has ties to at least one of North’s co-conspirators, and participated in activities that closely paralleled and possibly even initiated North’s arms-for-hostages dealings.

Silberman’s vote proved decisive in the court’s 2-1 ruling to throw out North’s convic­tions.

A key Iran-contra figure linked to Silberman is Robert McFarlane, former-President Reagan’s National Security Advisor, and North’s former boss. In the fall of 1980, Silberman and McFarlane took part in a controversial meeting to discuss the possible release of the 52 American hostages being held in Teheran in exchange for U.S. military equipment. Silberman, at the time, was a top advisor to the Reagan-Bush presidential campaign. McFarlane was on the staff of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Also present at the meeting was Richard Allen, Silberman’s immediate superior and chief foreign policy analyst for the Republican campaign, and another man who claimed to be a representative of the Iranian government.

The four men met in the lobby of the L’Enfant Hotel in Washington, D.C., shortly before the 1980 presidential election. Significant details remain sketchy, however. “All I can remember was that there was discussion about somehow releasing the hostages to the Reagan campaign or under the auspices of the Reagan campaign … humiliate Carter and influence our election,” Silberman told the San Jose Mercury News.”

In 1988, Houshang Lavi, an Iranian-born arms dealer, stepped forward claiming to be the “emissary” who met with Silberman, McFarlane, and Allen. Silberman does not deny knowing Lavi, but in an interview in Newsday, he stated that he was “sure” that Lavi was not the emissary at L’Enfant Plaza. After being confronted with Lavi’s notes from the meeting, however, Silber­man downgraded his disclaimer to being “virtually certain.”

As we now know, both Allen and McFarlane went on to become President Reagan’s National Security Advisor, and interestingly enough, Silberman went on to become the Reagan­/Bush transition team’s liaison to the CIA during the period between the election and the inaugu­ration before being appointed to the federal judiciary by President Reagan in 1985.

At this point, Judge Silberman, who made North’s acquittal possible, isn’t returning phone calls, and independent counsel Lawrence Walsh has refused comment on the matter. And so, it seems, has the press.


SOURCE: RANDOM LENGTHS, PO Box 731, San Pedro, CA 90733, DATE: 8/16/90

TITLE: “North Verdict Tainted”


COMMENTS: Investigative author David Armstrong, former editor of Random Lengths and now editor of The Texas Observer, notes that the conflict of interest issue in Oliver North’s acquittal was not covered at all in the mainstream media and suggests that the lack of coverage was not accidental on the part of the media. “This cannot be regarded as a simple oversight, however, since many publications – including the Washington Post and the San Jose Mercury News – had carried stories detailing Silberman’s involvement in the October Surprise negotia­tions on previous occasions. Reporters at both the Los Angeles and New York Times were also aware of Silberman’s involvement in these meetings. There can be no doubt about the fact that the decision to not cover this aspect of the story was deliberate.” Armstrong suggests that “The primary beneficiaries of this cover-up are the military-industrial complex and status quo politi­cians. The media’s failure to expose Silberman’s conflict of interest, leads the public to believe that the decision to overturn North’s conviction was based on sound legal principle. The overall message is that `everything’s OK, the system’s working perfectly.’ Whatever problems exist are the results of the excesses of a few miscreants who have been identified and brought to justice. The systemic nature of the problem is never revealed. The corporate media have willingly perpetuated this fraud.” According to Armstrong, “Wider exposure of this story would allow the general public to see that the government’s handling of the entire Iran-contra scandal – from the Congressional `investigation’ to the Special Prosecutor’s `criminal prosecution’ – has been a complete whitewash. There is little chance that the corporate media will do anything to rectify the situation, however, since it has been a party to this farce from the beginning.”

Facebook Comments