Connect With Us

“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States


Just ten years ago, George Bush, as the new vice president, became chair of Ronald Reagan’s Task Force on Regulator Relief. In fact, he pioneered the concept of a vice president who serves as a lobbyist for regulated industries in Washington.

Now It’s Dan Quayle’s turn. The vice president is on a quiet crusade to rein in federal regulation, an effort critics say is undermining the Clean Air Act, as well as a range of other environmental protections. Quayle is exerting his new-found influence through the Council on Competitiveness, a little-known cabinet-level committee that he heads. The council membership alone shows the importance President Bush attaches to it: John Sununu, White House chief of staff, Dick Thornburgh, attorney general (until his departure); Nicholas Brady, treasury secretary; Michael Boskin, Council of Economic Advisers chair; Richard Darman, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) director; and Robert Mosbacher, secretary of commerce.

Quayle’s council has quietly taken on a new role as overseer of the Office of Management and Budget, rewriting proposed regulations governing recycling, pollution permits, Grand Canyon air quality, and non-environmental laws such as the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as leading major negotiations on wetlands protections and biotechnology controls.

This past spring, the Council re-wrote air-pollution permit standards, the first major regulation implementing the 1990 Clean Air Act. Congressional aides and environmentalists who had worked with the EPA in drafting the rule were stunned to find that the “minor permit amendments” had been changed to allow some 34,000 pollution sources to increase the amount of pollution they generate as much as they choose, merely by notifying their state that they plan to do so. If the state fails to protest in seven days, the increase becomes permanent. A requirement that permit changes be open to public review was also deleted. An April 6 memo from the Council to the EPA dictated the permit amendment changes and more than 100 others.

The Council’s pre-emptive power is so considerable that it can overrule heads of agencies like EPA administrator William Reilly.

Congressman Henry Waxman of California believes that Quayle’s operation is “flagrantly illegal.” No law gives Quayle the right to veto or undercut a pollution-control program mandated by Congress. However, there is no Congressional oversight of his council and no way of knowing what transpires in the council’s communications with the regulated companies. In fact, very little is even known about the inner working of the Council because it communicates with the outside world largely through press releases and its monthly meetings are not open to the public.


SOURCE: THE AMICUS JOURNAL, 40 West 20th St., New York, NY 10011, DATE: Summer 1991

TITLE: “Unfair Competition”

AUTHOR: Nancy Shute

SOURCE: THE NATION, 72 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011, DATE: 7/29/91

TITLE: “Dan Quayle, Business’s Backdoor Boy”

AUTHOR: Jim Sibbison

COMMENTS: Author Nancy Shute said that prior to the Amicus Journal story, the subject of administration interference into the regulatory process had received almost no coverage. However, she points out, “Regulations have as much impact as the laws they enforce, yet receive far less coverage than the legislative process.” And the public needs to know that laws can be altered in the regulatory process. Shute adds that major media coverage has improved since the Amicus article and that Congressional hearings and investigations have been held.

Investigative reporter Jim Sibbison also confirmed that there was significant coverage of the issue toward the end of 1991. However, he adds, “The problem is that the media make no attempt to find out the corporate polluters who benefit from Quayle’s effort — no attempt to name names. The corporations benefit despite the coverage, which is fuzzy and timid.” Sibbison says that the public should be aware that “George Bush, the environmental president, along with Vice President Dan Quayle, are guilty of malfeasance in administering environmental programs.” Sibbison charges that despite the improved coverage, this message isn’t coming through. He notes that on December 24, 1991, the New York Times had a “page one story to the effect that Quayle’s impact on regulations is slight. The problem turns out to be too many regulations encumbering industry.”

Facebook Comments