Connect With Us

“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney

12. The Grand Jury That Wouldn’t Take It Any More

Sources: DENVER WESTWORD, Date: 9/30/92+, Title: “Rocky Flats Grand Jury” series, Authors: Bryan Abas and Patricia Calhoun; HARPER’S MAGAZINE, Date: 12/92, Title: “Readings: The Grand Jury Report”;  THE DENVER POST, Date: 1/5/93, Title: “Panel: Flats probe thwarted” Authors: Kelly Richmond and Robert Kowalski; THE WASHINGTON POST, Date: 8/11/93, Title: “Free the Rocky Flats 23,” Author: Jonathan Turley

SSU Censored Researcher: Kristen Rutledge

SYNOPSIS: “For forty years, fed­eral, Coloradan, and local regula­tors and elected officials have been unable to make the Department of Energy (DOE) and the plant’s cor­porate operators obey the law. Indeed the plant has been, and continues to be, operated by gov­ernment and corporate employees who have placed themselves above the law and who have hidden their illegal conduct behind the cloak of ,national security’.”-from sealed report of the special grand jury impaneled in Denver in August 1989, and submitted to the court in March 1992.

But all that seemed to end on March 26, 1992, when a U.S. prose­cuting attorney announced that Rockwell International, the com­pany that operated the Rocky Flats nuclear-weapons plant in Colorado for 14 years, had pled guilty to ten charges of violating federal haz­ardous waste disposal and clean water laws. The plea bargain called for an $18.5 million fine which Rockwell agreed to pay. All that remained was for the court to approve the settlement.

That might have been the end of this environmental crime if it had not been for a grand jury of 23 citi­zens who refused to participate in a cover-up and an aggressive alterna­tive weekly newspaper, the Denver­-based Westword, which believed in the public’s right to know.

While the prosecuting attorney announced that Rockwell’s fine would be the largest ever collected by the federal government for viola­tions of hazardous waste disposal laws, critics pointed out that the $18.5 million fine was less than the $22.6 million in bonus fees awarded Rockwell from 1987 to 1989.

On September 30, 1992, Westword started publishing a remarkable series of articles by Bryan Abas and Westword editor Patricia Calhoun about the jury investigation-including incrimi­nating court documents and charges of an official cover-up.

On November 20, 1992, the grand jurors went public charging that the Justice Department pre­vented them from fulfilling their oaths to pursue wrongdoing regard­less of the consequences. In turn, the Justice Department threatened them with criminal charges for revealing information on the case.

Jonathan Turley, an environ­mental law professor at George Washington University, who also is representing the jurors on a pro bono basis, cited the “Rocky Flats 23” for being the first grand jury in history to risk possible personal incarceration for revealing informa­tion critical of the Justice Department.

By August 1993, the justice Department’s environmental crimes section was being investi­gated by the department itself and by a House oversight subcommittee to determine whether the Bush administration allowed corpora­tions and corporate officials to escape punishment for serious envi­ronmental crimes.

Turley reported, “House investi­gators, while facing what one of them called `extreme’ resistance from the department, uncovered evidence of high-level intervention by Justice Department officials to reduce both charges and fines against Rockwell.” Oversight sub­committee chairman Howard Wolpe and other lawmakers have asked President Bill Clinton to pardon the grand jurors.

COMMENTS: The Rocky Flats case is a classic example of how a small but aggressive weekly paper can bring an issue to national attention through its own persis­tent coverage. While the Rocky Flats Grand Jury story started in mid-1989, it wasn’t until late 1992 that it started to attract media attention, as reported by Amy Asch, promotion manager for Harper’s Magazine.

 The Denver Westword started covering the story on September 30, 1992, when it published the first in a series of articles about the Rocky Flats Grand Jury by reporter Bryan Abas and Westword editor Patricia Calhoun. Abas had obtained a draft copy of the grand jury’s report, which had been sealed by, the judge, and, according to Asch, “Harper’s Magazine brought the story to the national press, by printing the first lengthy extract from the document in the December 1992 issue. This resulted in news stories being written by The New York Times, the Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Rocky Mountain News, Sacramento Bee, and other newspapers.”

Westword editor Calhoun point­ed out that if Westword had “not broken the original story-and like the grand jurors, risked contempt of court in doing so-it’s unlikely that the subject would have ever seen the light of day.”

Calhoun said the general public would benefit from even wider exposure of this story since “Rocky Flats is only one instance of the justice department dragging its heels on the issue of environmental crimes at federal facilities. A Congressional subcommittee is currently considering thirty other cases in which Justice may have willfully failed to prosecute such crimes. Certainly, wider exposure of the Rocky Flats story would illumi­nate these other cases.”

Calhoun noted that the primary beneficiaries of the lack of cov­erage given the issue include the Justice Department, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, and Rockwell International.

Harper’s Asch notes that the magazine “believes strongly in pro­viding the facts and letting readers make their own decisions. The Rocky Flats cover-up … is not only an environmental issue, but also concerns the negligent behavior of the DOE, and what seems to be an attempt by the Justice Department to cover up the DOE’s cover-up of its environmental abuses.”

Ironically, more than four years after this story started, it still has not received the coverage necessary to prod the administration to resolve it. On November 1, 1993, Dick Thomas, associate editor of The Oregonian, in Portland, reported that the Rocky Flats grand jurors still haven’t received justice and “remain unanimous in their commitment to disclosing what they know about the crimes com­mitted at Rocky Flats.”

Facebook Comments