Connect With Us

“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader

14. Faulty Nuclear Fuel Rods Spell Potential Disasters

Source: MOTHER JONES Date: May/June 1994 Title: “Faulty Rods” Author: Ashley Craddock

SSU Censored Researcher: Dan Tomerlin

SYNOPSIS: The critical fuel rods in 108 of our nation’s licensed nuclear power plants are failing in increasing numbers and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) knows about it … but is doing nothing.

Fuel rods, zirconium alloy tubes that contain the radioactive ura­nium in reactor cores, are the first level of protection against the release of deadly radioactive mate­rial. The coolant system is the second level of protection; the third and final level is the actual contain­ment building.

The NRC has been warned about a faulty manufacturing process by the engineer who helped design it, but has done little to prevent poten­tially flawed fuel rod casings from being shipped to plants here and abroad. While the NRC sent a notice warning plant operators about fuel rod failures and specifi­cally cited seven reactors where such failures had occurred, it didn’t men­tion that two of those reactors were of the type susceptible to contain­ment building failure.

For more than three years, Chris Hall, the mechanical engineer who blew the whistle on the faulty fuel rods, tried to tell the NRC that a manufacturing process used by his former employer, Teledyne Wah Chang Albany (TWCA), could explain the fuel rod failures. For his efforts, Hall, who helped design the process, was fired by TWCA.

TWCA’s faulty fuel rods could be discovered in the manufacturing process if the company’s quality control efforts were more rigorous. However TWCA quality assurance engineers usually test just one end of three random tubes out of each batch of approximately 120, (or 1.25 percent, given that each tube has two ends).

According to Dr. Michio Kaku, professor of nuclear physics at City University of New York, a major problem with the NRC is the agency’s “hear no evil, see no evil” approach. In fact, a 1990 General Accounting Office (GAO) report concluded that this policy histori­cally resulted in the installation of substandard and even counterfeit parts in nuclear reactors. The report said that after finding “problems with 12 utilities’ quality assurance programs” (out of 13 inspected), the NRC simply concluded that substandard products were an industry-wide problem and, as such, weren’t the fault of individual utilities. The GAO report blasted the NRC for “deferring its regula­tory responsibility” at a time when “an increasing number of commer­cial-grade products” used in nuclear reactors were of question­able quality.

Equally disturbing, even if no meltdown occurs, failing fuel rods pose other potentially lethal haz­ards. A 1990 study by the Mass­achusetts Department of Public Health revealed that failed fuel rods at Boston Edison’s Pilgrim plant reg­ularly released radioactivity into the atmosphere between 1972 and 1979. The study also noted that the adult leukemia rate within a 10-mile radius of the plant was four times that of outlying areas.

Investigative journalist Ashley Craddock, a fellow at Mother Jones, described the public implications of the fuel rod issue: “The rods are a potential safety hazard to millions of people through the release of radioactive material into the envi­ronment. Some experts believe that corroded rods could exacerbate other system failures and contribute to a core meltdown, resulting in sub­stantial fatalities and the contami­nation of food, air, and water.”

COMMENTS: Author Ashley Craddock reports that the problem of potentially faulty nuclear fuel rods (the primary level of protec­tion against radiation leakage) received zero attention in the mass media last year. Craddock feels it is “probably as a result of the subject matter’s being fairly dense and sci­entific, combined with the fact that nuclear reactors are essentially out of fashion as story subjects-they aren’t sexy.”

However, Craddock points out, “If the mass media had picked up the story, the general public could demand that reactors be run at power levels that would put less stress on potentially flawed rods. Moreover, mass coverage would force the NRC to conduct more rig­orous tests of the rods. More gener­ally, it might galvanize the general public into putting more pressure on the NRC to responsibly admin­ister the nation’s nuclear plants.”

While acknowledging that the NRC escapes criticism that might be leveled against it, Craddock charges that Teledyne is the real beneficiary of the lack of coverage.

“They hold a locked grip on the supply of zirconium tube hollows used to manufacture fuel rods for most GE-manufactured reactors. As long as no one questions the quality of their tubes, they can send out whatever they like, wher­ever they like, no matter what the potential dangers to the public.”

Craddock notes that while “Faulty Rods” was sent to hundreds of print and broadcast media and nearly 200 reporters whose beats include monitoring nuclear power plants, the story was only picked up by Swiss television, local TV in Portland, the Boston Phoenix and the L.A. Weekly. Nonetheless, the story continues to develop and has helped precipitate renewed interest and investigation by additional gov­ernment agencies, according to Craddock.

Facebook Comments