Connect With Us

“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review

14. The U.S. Blood is Increasingly Threatened by Parasites

Source: LABORATORY MEDICINE Title: “The Threat Of Chagas’ Disease in Transfusion Medicine: The Presence of Antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in the U.S. Blood Supply”, Date: April 1997, Authors: Alfred A. Pan, Ph.D., and Martin Winkler, Ph.D.

SSU Censored Researchers: Kecia Kaiser and Catherine Hickinbotham
Community Evaluator: Linda C. McCabe, MT(ASCP)

With increasing global migration comes the spread of infectious diseases that were once confined to specific areas of the world. A growing concern is the threat of transmission of Chagas’ disease through blood transfusions. Chagas’ disease affects several million individuals worldwide, and, in Latin America, causes more deaths than infection with HIV or hepatitis. ‘The World Health Organization (WHO) considers the control of Chagas’ disease to be ranked in third place after malaria and schistosomiasis control. At present, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved any serologic test screening blood donors for antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite that causes the disease, although three U.S. manufacturers have received FDA approval of an antibody test. The Laboratory Medicine article focuses on the biology, transmission, prevalence in the United States, diagnostic tests, the potential for transmission, and challenges this disease presents to the U.S. blood banking and public health communities.

The disease is usually spread by the Reduviid bug (kissing bug), whose habitat ranges from northern California to northern Maryland, and south through the southern regions of Argentina. When taking a blood-meal from a human, the insect defecates, leaving behind an infective form of the parasite known as the metacyclic trypomastigote. These trypomastigotes enter the bloodstream, either by being scratched into the bite wound or by direct contact with the host’s mucosa. The parasite commonly invades cells of the liver, spleen, and lymphatic system, as well as cardiac, smooth, and skeletal muscles. The nervous system, intestinal mucosa, skin, gonads, bone marrow, and placenta may also become infected. The initial symptoms may include anemia, chills, nervous disorders, muscle and bone pain, and loss of strength. Death may occur three to four weeks after infection, although many people may live a long life even with this debilitating disease.

It is highly probable that infected donors are giving blood in North America. A study in Sacramento, California, indicated a rate of 1 in 2000 in the blood supply, and reactive specimens have been identified from blood banks in New Orleans and Miami.

Between 30,000-45,000 people with chronic Chagas’ disease are estimated to be living in the United States. Until recently, diagnosis has been difficult because no simple blood test has been available. Instead, clinicians have had to rely on tissue biopsy, or the cumbersome method of xenodiagnosis, which takes several weeks to perform. Therefore, many people in the U.S. with heart disease caused by Chagas’ are misdiagnosed regarding the root of their problem.

The American Red Cross has performed several studies to determine the rates of seropositive donors. They found that the median prevalence rate for all 18 centers showed 1 out of 340 donors to be at risk for T. cruzi infection. At present however, the FDA has not yet approved any test screening of blood donors for antibodies to Chagas’ Disease. Currently, all units of blood are screened for eight separate disease markers, but Chagas’ is not among them. How much more data is needed before donor screening is mandated to prevent Chagas’ disease from being in our blood supply? So far, three people have been identified as getting Chagas’ disease through blood transfusions in the U.S., and one person died after getting infected bone marrow. Will it take a wrongful death lawsuit before our blood supply is screened for this potentially fatal pathogen?

UPDATE BY AUTHOR ALFRED PAN, PH.D.: “Is Chagas’ disease an emerging disease in the U.S.? Perhaps we should call it an unrecognized disease. It is estimated that 16-18 million people are infected. Although these numbers appear large, few physicians know of its existence. There have been reported cases in North America and Europe. In Italy, estimates of 20,000 to 40,000 potential infectants of Chagas’ disease exist (Crovato and Rebora, 1997).

“There have been four studies (i.e. more than 10,000 specimens) conducted in the U.S. using a Chagas Ab EIA (enzyme immunoassay). The first study identified 14 of 13,209 donor samples (0.105 percent) as being reactive for antibody to T. cruzi. When sub-classified into Hispanic donors, an incidence rate of 1.5 percent (9 in 603) was revealed (Brashear, et al., Transfusion, 1995). In a second study by the Red Cross (Los Angeles and Miami), 23,978 at-risk and 25,587 control donations were tested. The EIA identified 34 donors (33 and 1, respectively) (Leiby, et al., 1997a). Seroprevalence rates indicated 0.14 percent and 0.07 percent, respectively. A third study at the Stanford Blood Center tested 39,776 donations. There were three confirmed specimens (Galel, et al., 1997). The last report tested 100,089 blood donors in an Oklahoma and Texas low-risk population. There were three confirmed samples. One positive donor was born in Mexico, and the other two reported no risk for T. cruzi; both were born in the U.S. (Leiby, et al., 1997b). In all studies, confirmation involved a Radioimmuoprecipitation assay (RIPA) (Kirchhoff, et al., 1987; Winkler, et al., 1995). Note that in some of the above investigations questionnaires failed to identify high-risk. Chagasic antibody reactive candidates.

“Additional studies in 1997 indicated similar seroprevalence rates. In Los Angeles, 1311 of 3320 donors were at risk to T. cruzi infection. Seven donors were reactive by a Chagas IgG ELISA, and six were reactive with RIPA (Shulman, et al., 1997). However, a study conducted in the Southeastern U.S. (Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Georgia) indicated that zero out of 6,013 were confirmed reactive (Barrett, et al., 1997). This is in contrast to a study where two specimens were identified as being reactive by the Chagas Ab EIA and confirmed at a New Orleans, Louisiana, blood bank (Pan, unpublished results).

“Individuals seropositive for antibodies to T. cruzi are donating in several areas of the U.S. A summary of studies indicate seroprevalence from 0.07 percent to 4.9 percent. Compare these numbers to an HIV p 24 Ag test recently instituted. After one year of testing an identification rate of 1 out of 5.25 million units (0.000019 percent) was found (Stramer, et al., 1997). The numbers of T. cruzi-infected blood donors still have an uncertain effect on the safety of the blood supply and the public health system.”

Facebook Comments