Connect With Us

“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review

15. DARE Program Cover-up Continues

Sources: QUILL Date: May 1994, Title: “Editor’s deadline changes to DARE piece stir trouble,” Author: Richard P Cunningham

THE BOSTON GLOBE Date: 9/29/94, Title: “US rejects unfavorable DARE study,” Author: Sean P Murphy; USA TODAY, Date: 10/4/94, Title: “Study critical of DARE rejected,” Author: Dennis Cauchon

SSU Censored Researcher: Jessica Nystrom

SYNOPSIS: The 23rd Censored story of 1993, titled “The Biggest Drug Bust of All,” revealed that the nation’s most popular school-based drug prevention program-Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE)-was a failure, and how the media failed to cover the story. The story is nominated again for 1994 for three reasons: 1) evidence that one of the nation’s leading newspapers, The Washington Post, revised an article, without the author’s permission, on behalf of the DARE program; 2) evidence that the U.S. Department of Justice covered up the program’s failure by rejecting a study it com­missioned that concluded that the DARE program doesn’t work; and 3) continued failure of the news media to put the issue on the national agenda.

In November 1993, freelance writer James Bovard submitted an article to The Washington Post that criticized the DARE program for “turning children into informants on drug-using parents or friends.” On Sunday, January 30, 1994, fol­lowing discussions between Post edi­tors and attorneys and DARE attorneys, the article appeared with significant changes … without con­sulting or notifying the author of the changes. On February 4, the Post published a correction admitting an error due to an editing change not discussed with the author. The Post also reimbursed the family cited in the article for costs incurred in negotiating the correction. Commenting on DARE’s influence, the attorney representing the family said, “To be able to control The Washington Post is awesome.”

On September 29, 1994, The Boston Globe reported that the Justice Department had rejected its own study criticizing the DARE program. Justice paid the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) $300,000 for the two year-study that con­cluded “that DARE’s short-term effectiveness for reducing or pre­venting drug use behavior is small. DARE received about $750 million in government appropriations and private donations. RTI found that while DARE improved the stu­dents’ knowledge of drugs and their social skills, it had no significant effect on their use of drugs. Despite the Justice Department’s attempts to have RTI modify its findings, RTI decided to stick with its con­clusions which were published in the American Journal o f Public

Health (AJPH) on October 4, 1994. Dennis Cauchon, the USA Today reporter who wrote the original story on DARE in 1993, reported that the DARE study passed rig­orous scrutiny by academic experts before publication by AJPH. The Journal’s Sabine Beisler said DARE “tried to interfere with the publica­tion of this (article). They tried to intimidate us.” In its conclusion, RTI wrote, “DARE’s limited influ­ence on adolescent drug use behav­iors contrasts with the program’s popularity and prevalence. An important implication is that DARE could be taking the place of other, more beneficial drug use cur­ricula that adolescents could be receiving.”

In rejecting the RTI study, Anne Voitt, Justice Department spokes­woman, said the study did not examine a big enough sample of students involved in DARE to properly judge it. Voitt also said that the DARE study is the first time the National Institute of Justice, the Justice Department’s research branch, has rejected a study in recent years.

COMMENTS: Richard P Cunningham, author of the Quill article, said that the “big news media have not written and broad­cast enough about DARE. If they had, local newspapers would know that the program is controversial and would be saying so when DARE comes to their towns. That is not happening in my area: at least two school systems have admitted DARE, but I have never seen anything but positive feature stories about the program.”

Cunningham also points out that if the media provided more coverage on the DARE program, “parents and taxpayers could ask better questions about the philos­ophy, the cost and the effectiveness of DARE.” He concludes that “DARE must reap financial and propaganda benefits from not having to answer hard questions” about the program.

Sean P Murphy, the Boston Globe journalist who reported in September that the Justice Department had rejected its own study criticizing the DARE pro­gram, agreed that the subject hadn’t received sufficient coverage in the mass media. He pointed out that the public would benefit from additional exposure since there are million of dollars at stake … as well as the future of children. The real beneficiary of the limited coverage, Murphy said, was the DARE pro­gram itself.

On Monday, December 12, 1994, the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research released a major national study that revealed that the number of American teens using illicit drugs increased for the third consecutive year. The study showed that mari­juana use increased sharply in all age groups over the past two to three years and that use of LSD and powder and crack cocaine also increased, although not as sharply as marijuana.

Facebook Comments