Connect With Us

“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.

17. Censoring Tomorrow’s Journalists Today

Source: FREEDOM FORUM, Date: February 1994, Title: DEATH BY CHEESE­BURGER: High School journalism in the 1990s and Beyond, Authors: Alice Bonner and Judith Hines

SSU Censored Researcher: Jennifer Bums

SYNOPSIS: In 1988, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment did not apply to student journalists. In “Hazelwood School District vs. Kuhlmeier,” the Court ruled that the principal of Hazelwood East High School, near St. Louis, did not violate the First Amendment rights of students by deleting two pages of the campus newspaper which contained mate­rial he found offensive. In what some considered an unconstitu­tional act, the Court gave school administrators the power to prac­tice prior restraint over student newspapers.

Surprisingly, this unprecedented action generated little outrage among professional journalists, who might have been expected to spring

1. The defense of student journal­ists. In fact, many of the 1988 edi­torials commenting on Hazelwood in the professional press almost seemed to mock the students for their arrogance in believing they should be allowed to cover what was important to them. Comparing the principal to a newspaper pub­lisher, they said young people might as well learn early that reporters and editors don’t always get their way.

Not surprisingly, high school principals who want to control the student press seized upon Hazelwood as a justification for prior review or for restriction of subjects students can write about. The Student Press Law Center (SPLC), which monitors student press rights, has reported an increase in requests for assistance with censorship problems from high school journalists since Hazelwood. The student publica­tions that call SPLC report censor­ship of articles, editorials, and advertisements considered contro­versial. Advisers report threats to their jobs if they refuse to follow school officials’ orders to censor material.

The chilling effect of Hazelwood is also reflected in the quality of the student press. An in-depth analysis of high school journalism by The Freedom Forum, a non-par­tisan organization dedicated to a free press, found that 72 percent of 233 student newspapers were either “average” or “boring.” The study also reported that of 270 high school newspaper advisors, 37 per­cent admitted that school princi­pals had rejected newspaper articles or required changes.

In a foreword to the study, John Seigenthaler, chair of the Freedom Forum, warned of the threat of cen­sorship to school newspapers. He also reproached the editors who rushed to endorse the press censor­ship in the Hazelwood decision in 1988 … and who since have defended the Court’s decision to crush high school press freedom. Seigenthaler also noted that the cases of outrageous censorship doc­umented in the Freedom Forum’s 182-page report are “horror sto­ries-gripping to read, oppressive to think about, offensive to the First Amendment.”

In describing how censorship can take hold quickly in a school, the report points out that “when students have been censored a number of times, they stop writing anything controversial, feeling that whatever they write either won’t make it into print or will get them into trouble with school adminis­trators.”

Journalists already indoctrinated into accepting censorship at the high school level are well prepared to enter professional careers at pub­lications more interested in maintaining the status quo than in muckraking. Perhaps this helps explain editors’ reluctance to criti­cize and publicize the Hazelwood decision and its impact.

COMMENTS: Co-authors Alice Bonner and Judith Hines point out that while Death By Cheeseburger was not itself a “censored” publica­tion, it tells the story of “the failure of high school journalism to live up to its high potential because of lack of funding, teacher preparation, equipment, school credit, and, yes, often overt censorship of the stu­dents’ voices. The subject has received almost no exposure in the last 20 years, when `Captive Voices,’ the most recent in-depth study of the high school press was pub­lished. Both the good news of the writing, analytical, organizational and entrepreneurial skills students can gain from working on a high school newspaper, and the bad news about the weakness of scholastic journalism have received too little exposure.”

The authors feel that if the sub­ject were to receive more coverage, teachers and students might receive a better journalism educa­tion, and teenagers and adults would benefit from hearing and reading the voices of young people-too seldom heard from today, especially concerning issues that affect them directly.

Those who benefit from the lim­ited media coverage given the issue include “school administrators and other adults who fear losing con­trol-who have little faith in giving teenagers responsibility so they can prove they can act responsibly.” And also those who have an investment in keeping things “the way we’ve always done it” in high school.

The Freedom Forum, seeking to increase the energy and support for high school journalism among edu­cators, journalists, and especially young people, is distributing Death By Cheeseburger as widely as pos­sible-offering a free copy to every high school and professional news­paper editor in the USA.

Facebook Comments