Connect With Us

Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times

17. Clinton’s Option 9 Plan: A Resounding Defeat for Ancient Forests

Sources: LIES OF OUR TIMES, Date: November 1993, Title: “Ancient Forests Meet the Press,” Author: Jeffrey St. Clair; THE NATION, Date: 8/23/93, Title: “Munich in the Redwoods,” Author: Alexander Cockburn

SSU Censored Researcher: Sunil Sharma

SYNOPSIS: On July 1, in the wake of the forest summit held in Portland, Oregon on April 2, 1993, President Clinton announced his administration’s plan for the ancient forests of the Pacific Northwest. The plan, known as Option 9, drew laudatory coverage from the mainstream media which heralded it as a victory for environ­mentalists. However, a close look at Option 9 reveals that it is a major defeat for environmentalists …and the ancient forests.

Immediately following the summit, a team of experts, headed by Forestry Service ecologist and ecosystems advocate Jack Ward Thomas, were given only two months by the Clinton administra­tion to come up with a range of options for managing the Northwest forests in a way that would protect the spotted owl, the marbled murrelet, and salmon, “while also providing a steady flow to Northwest mills.” The team met their June 2 deadline and presented the administration with eight options. All eight options called for significant reductions in timber sales. While Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt earlier had promised loggers the administration would quickly release at least 2 billion board-feet of timber, most of the plans would have limited the cut­ting to 500 million board-feet annually.

This was simply unacceptable to the Clinton administration. Thomas was quickly replaced by Jerry Franklin of Washington University who put together Option 9 in less than three weeks.

The plan espouses the already discredited notion of a network of “riparian corridors” and old-growth reserves. A forest reserve is gener­ally defined as an area where no logging is permitted. However, under Option 9, the system of reserves are considered to be nei­ther inviolate nor permanent. Every reserve would be open to thinning operations and timber salvage sales.

Less than five percent of the original old growth forest still exists, located mainly in national forests and on public land. (The Mt. Hood National Forest in Oregon has been cut more heavily than the Brazilian rainforest). Nonetheless, under Option 9, “At least 40 per­cent of the remaining old-growth would be subject to clear-cutting.” And the remaining 60 percent isn’t considered inviolate! These lands provide habitat for thousands of plant and animal species. Option 9 threatens over 100 of these species, which depend on the old growth forests, with eventual extinction.

According to Jeffrey St. Clair, editor of ForestWatch magazine, two million acres of Northwest forests are essentially wild roadless areas which are “vital repositories of biological diversity,” critical to the survival of many species. Under Option 9, St. Clair said, these areas receive no special attention; “Clear-cutting would continue even in the most ecologically sensitive roadless areas.” Option 9 also pro­poses to exempt private landowners from the Endangered Species Act, allowing them to clear-cut spotted owl and murrelet habitat. Clinton’s announcement of Option 9 came before the study itself was even released. St. Clair reported that the vast majority of news stories “were filed before reporters had actually seen the 1,800-page plan.” Most of the sto­ries, which the American public read, were based on a vague nine-­page White House press release. Furthermore, the administration ordered its scientists to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act; and all background documents, relating to the development of Option 9 and detailing the extent of political pressure, were either shredded or sealed.

COMMENTS: Jeffrey St. Clair, investigative author and editor of ForestWatch magazine, charged that President Clinton’s new Option 9 forest plan “received lots of hype and initial exposure, but little analysis and almost no follow-­up. The analysis that was published was either superficial, politically biased, and/or flat-out wrong.”

St. Clair feels it was important for the public to know more about this issue: “The President’s forest – plan was the Clinton administration’s first major policy decision on an environmental issue. The tactics of the administration on this issue revealed much about how they would treat other issues, like wet­lands, public land grazing, the Endangered Species Act, and Clean Water Act.”

According to St. Clair, the inter­ests being served by the limited coverage given the Option 9 forest plan include the Clinton adminis­tration, labor, timber interests, and Japanese timber importers.

St. Clair said that The Nation, High Country News, and Lies Of Our Times continue to be the only publications to pursue in-depth political reporting and investiga­tion into this issue. Other articles he has written on the subject have been rejected by the mainstream media.

Meanwhile, the Option 9 plan, so widely-touted by the mainstream media as the solution to the log­ging vs. environmentalist contro­versy in mid-1993 appeared to be unraveling by the end of the year.

On November 26, USA Today reported that the plan was “fraying at both ends.” Environmentalists claim the plan breaks the law because it doesn’t protect Northern spotted owls and 400 other species dependent on ancient forests. Timber and paper companies claim the plan is economically damaging, unscientific, and will result in dangerous wildfires in the region. And by December 11, the Los Angeles Times was reporting that a new Clinton proposal to relax logging requirements on private lands in the Northwest had renewed the controversy over the spotted owl.

Ironically, as 1993 drew to a close, the Clinton administration turned to the person whose original eight pro­posals had been rejected. Jack Ward Thomas, the career Forest Service wildlife biologist from LaGrande, Oregon, was named the new chief of the U.S. Forest Service in an apparent effort to restore the reputa­tion of the agency.

Facebook Comments