Connect With Us

“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union

19. Poison in the Pacific

Source: The Progressive, 409 E. Main Street Wisconsin, WI 53703, Date: July 1992, Title: “Poison in the Pacific,” Author: Robert Walters

 SSU Censored Researcher Pete Anderson

SYNOPSIS: In 1962, Johnston Island, a once idyllic atoll in the mid-Pacific, be­came the site of one of man’s most de­structive experiments — the atmospheric nuclear tests conducted by the United States. Today, it is once again the site of a potentially catastrophic event — the dismantling and destruction of more than 60 mil­lion pounds of aging but increasingly deadly chemical weapons. The Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System is a massive incinerator complex built by the Army at a cost of $240 million. This will serve as the prototype for similar facilities to be built at eight designated sites in the United States.

The 400,000 chemical weapons to be destroyed on Johnston Island were fabri­cated for use in World Wars I and II and then for deployment against the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Because they’re increasingly unstable, military ex­perts fear that if not soon neutralized, they could explode or ignite spontaneously­ possibly causing a catastrophic accident.

Equally worrisome, the testing has not gone well. Originally, the test period was to last about 16 months, from mid­1990 through late 1991. But as investigative journalist Robert Walters discovered, “Work had to be halted on 65 of the first 85 days of scheduled operations in 1990 be­cause gas-leak monitors sounded false alarms, conveyor belts melted, the incin­erator overheated and mechanical equip­ment failed. Last year, major repairs and modifications required a protracted shut­down.”

Meanwhile, given the anxiety and hostility among residents of communities adjacent to almost all of the eight main­land Army bases where decommission­ing is scheduled to occur in the future, serious questions have arisen about whether those facilities should ever by built in the U.S. Now, thought is being given to dismantling the entire U.S. opera­tion and moving it to Johnston Island. Not surprisingly, this prospect has made Pa­cific Island residents and public officials, including those in Hawaii, increasingly fearful that the region’s air, land and water will be poisoned by seepage of lethal diox­ins and furans produced during the incin­eration process.

However, the Army is not overly con­cerned with the feelings of the 1,200 resi­dents of Johnston Island: 900 of them are employees of companies holding Defense Department contracts and the other 300 are Army personnel.

When President George Bush flew to Hawaii on a political trip in 1990, he held a little-publicized meeting with the leaders of 11 small mid-Pacific nations to discuss their concern that the Johnston Island testing operation would become the sole disposal site. He assured the leaders that the U.S. planned to dispose of “only the chemical munitions…found in the Pacific Islands and those relatively small quanti­ties shipped from Germany.” (One hun­dred thousand chemical artillery shells, originally stored in West Germany, were shipped to Johnston Island in late 1990.) Despite the President’s reassurances, there is still concern among the islanders.

 COMMENTS: Investigative author Robert Walters charges that “Nothing-absolutely nothing-that occurs in the interior Pacific ,receives sufficient exposure in the media’ in any given year. The article in question was about environmental perils in the re­gion, but other issues are equally well ignored. That’s ironic at a time when the ‘Pacific Basin’ supposedly has become so important to the rest of the world.

“In fact, all of that region’s highly pub­licized growth is occurring in the nations along the ocean’s rim. The interior island jurisdictions, scattered across a vast ex­panse of water that covers one-third of the planet’s surface, have been consigned to the status of ‘fly-over country.’ For those traveling between Seattle, Los Angeles or Chicago and Tokyo, Taipei or Hong Kong, island countries such as Nauru and Niue have become the region’s counterparts of Kansas and Nebraska-not suitable for viewing at an altitude of less than 35,000 feet.

“Understanding what occurs in the insular Pacific is especially important for citizens of the United States, which de­feated Japan in World War II for rights to exercise military, economic, and cultural control over the single largest geographic feature on the face of the Earth.

“In the ensuing decades, this country has abused its position of power. It has conducted atmospheric nuclear tests that still contaminate the homes — and bodies — of innocent indigenous people, established debilitating welfare economies through the islands and now tests a discredited ‘Star Wars’ system by firing missiles from a California military base into an atoll in the Marshall Islands.

“There’s almost certainly a correla­tion between the lack of press coverage and the growing popularity of the insular Pacific as a venue to dump the ‘civilized world’s’ industrial, commercial and resi­dential garbage. The physically remote location minimizes the likelihood that the news media (or others who might engage in oversight) will be on hand to report on what is occurring.”

As Walters said in his article: “Entre­preneurs from outside the region prefer to do business in the remote locations of the interior Pacific, where they’re unlikely to encounter aggressive regulators, environ­mentalists, curious journalists or others who might cramp their style.”

Facebook Comments