Connect With Us

“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review


The Environmental Protection Agency was created in 1970 to administer and enforce national pollution control laws dealing with air and water pollution, noise abatement, solid waste management, pesticide regulation and radiation standard-setting.

In June 1991, the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on oversight and investigations issued a report that charged the EPA with failing to perform its responsibilities.

Specifically, the report said EPA auditors failed to pursue potential waste and fraud in some $8.6 billion worth of government contracts, including critical work on the Superfund hazardous waste cleanup program.

It charged that the independent watchdog office within the EPA is “plagued by serious leadership failures,” that efforts to audit serious fraud allegations against one of EPA’s largest contractors were “superficial,” and that investigators’ performance in prosecuting potential fraud by Superfund cleanup contractors was “dismal.”

The report, which covered fiscal years 1984 through 1990, added that there were 273 outstanding requests for audits that had not been attended to and called that “simply staggering.”

The subcommittee report said the EPA Inspector General’s office missed serious problems discovered by Pentagon auditors and EPA procurement officials and ignored those findings as well as investigations by the inspector general’s regional office.

Of 48 Superfund cases selected for investigation from 1984-90, the report said only four percent resulted in any prosecution and only eight percent led to administrative action such as employee dismissals.

The inspector general’s own standards rate an investigative manager’s performance as unsatisfactory if fewer than 25% of the closed cases lead to a criminal or administrative action.

One of the primary responsibilities of the press is to hold those in power accountable for their actions. In this case, the taxpayers will be stuck with the bill while the guilty parties once again avoid being held accountable.


SOURCE: LOS ANGELES TIMES (Associated Press) Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90037,  DATE: 7/7/91

TITLE: “EPA Fails to Pursue Fraud, Contract Abuse, Panel Says”

COMMENTS: Project Censored colleagues who have followed the works of environmental writer Jim Sibbison in the past won’t be surprised at this nomination. In 1988, Sibbison wrote the #2 story of the year where he revealed how reports of improvement in environmental pollution levels were a deliberate attempt by the EPA to mislead and pacify the public (Columbia Journalism Review, Nov/Dec 1988, “Dead fish and red herrings: how the EPA pollutes the news”). Again, in 1989, Sibbison, in the #22 story of the year, reported on the ethical question of the revolving door between high level EPA officials and the industry they reportedly are monitoring. (The Nation, 11 /6/89, “Revolving Door at the EPA.”)

In this year’s nomination, apparently an exception to Jeffrey Denny’s story of the failure of Congressional oversight (see # 14, page 44), the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on oversight and investigations attempted to expose an extraordinary case of EPA malfeasance but the mass media didn’t follow-up on the story.

The report, which cited EPA auditors for failure to pursue potential fraud and waste in nearly $9 billion of government contracts, in addition to 273 requests for audits not done, deserved far more coverage than the 12-column inches the Los Angeles Times gave the Associated Press story on page A4.

Facebook Comments