Connect With Us

“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite

22. Over-the-Counter” Diet Pills Cause Deaths

Source: MUCKRAKER Date: October 1994 Title: “Over-the-Counter Diet Pills and Cerebral Hemorrhages” Author: Diana Hembree

SSU Censored Researcher: Jessica Nystrom

SYNOPSIS: On the morning of October 12, 1990, 41-year-old Arlette Cannata took a popular diet pill called Acutrim, advertised as a safe and effective way to lose weight. Later that day she col­lapsed, was rushed to a local hos­pital, and died minutes later of a cerebral hemorrhage, or stroke.

An autopsy found the pill’s active ingredient, phenylpropanolamine, in her bloodstream, and a physician at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine later concluded the stroke was caused by the drug.

Arlette Cannata’s case is just one of a number in a decades-long controversy surrounding the use of over-the-counter diet pills and cold medications containing phenyl­propanolamine hydrochloride (PPA). The drug has a chemical structure similar to that of amphet­amine, or speed, and like speed, can trigger a sharp rise in blood pres­sure, sometimes resulting in stroke. PPA is found in many brands of popular diet pills such as Acutrim and Dexatrim, as well as in cold remedies such as Contac and Dimetapp.

This rare but alarming side effect has sparked a controversy within federal health agencies over whether to tighten restrictions on the widely available drug. It also has raised larger questions about whether such decisions are made quickly and effectively enough to protect consumers.

A year after Cannata’s death, Food and Drug Administration offi­cials learned that drug-industry data show 92 people had suffered PPA-linked strokes during an 11­year period. More than a dozen medical case reports have linked PPA to life-threatening strokes in previously healthy individuals; some strokes have occurred even at the recommended dosages.

Dr. Thaddeus Prout, an associate professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, defied “anyone to find another unregulated drug with such a record of disaster.” PPA, he said, “should be returned to the logical and safe place for purchase: the pharmacy.”

Dr. Sidney Wolfe, of the Public Citizen Health Research Group, said that “Over-the-counter diet pills should not be on the market­ — they’re dangerous.” He also criti­cized the slowness of the FDA’s review process as “unacceptable …. This has been going on for two decades.”

While most people who take the drug report no problems, for years medical experts have warned that a small number of PPA users have severe reactions to it, including seizures, psychosis, and strokes. Many others have reported less severe symptoms, ranging from headaches and nausea to anxiety and irregular heartbeats. Experts point out that some medical condi­tions increase the risk of PPA-­induced strokes and that people being treated for high blood pres­sure, diabetes, and heart, thyroid, or kidney disease should not take diet pills.

Drug manufacturers contend problems with PPA products are overstated and insist the drug is both safe and effective.

In a study published by the Western Journal of Medicine, James McDowell, a neurologist, noted that these drugs seem to pose a danger even to healthy people, and added, “I can’t understand why there hasn’t been more outcry over this.”

COMMENTS: Investigative jour­nalist Diana Hembree said that to date her story about over-the­-counter diet pills and cerebral hem­orrhages has not been carried by a wire service, the television net­works, or a newsweekly. “Besides appearing in the Center for Investigative Reporting’s internal publication, Muckraker, the story has been sold to a handful of out­lets: the Philadelphia Inquirer, Fox­-TV’s `Front Page,’ and the San Francisco Chronicle (where it appeared on 12/4/94). I feel the story is still underreported because there has been no wire pickup or network coverage to date.

“The millions of Americans who take PPA-containing diet pills-the majority of whom are women­ would greatly benefit from wider exposure of this subject. They would know they may be risking their lives each time they take over-­the-counter PPA diet pills, which have been known to cause strokes in previously healthy individuals even at the correct dosage. As one doctor told me, physicians always have to weigh a drug’s potential risks against its benefit. In the case of PPA, however, the doctor con­cluded that the risk of stroke com­pletely outweighed any possible benefits. `Diet pills are not a crucial drug like penicillin,’ he added, `and they haven’t even been proven effective.”‘

Hembree said the large pharma­ceutical companies that make PPA, and their directors, benefit from the lack of media coverage. “By set­tling nearly all diet pill/stroke law­suits out of court, with gag orders and sealed records, non-prescrip­tion drug manufacturers have effec­tively prevented news of stroke dangers from reaching the public. Such secrecy has also delayed the push for better regulation of such drugs.”

In an update, Hembree stated that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “is over­seeing a study of PPA and stroke by the Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers’ Association, which will complete its study in 1995. The FDA will pull PPA products off the shelves if the trade association docu­ments a stroke risk. However, the FDA already has criticized the trade association for what critics called apparent sabotage of the epidemio­logical study-not including a ‘con­trol’ group, for example. Although this omission has since been reme­died, such maneuvers have left some health advocates wary of the study.”

Facebook Comments