Connect With Us

“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union

25. University of Arizona Desecrates Sacred Native American Site

Sources: Action for Cultural Survival, Cultural Survival, Inc., 215 First Street Cambridge, MA 02142, Date: July/August 1992,  Title: “Apaches Protest Observatory,” Author: Jennifer Rathaus; Huracan, PO Box 7591, Minneapolis, MN 55407, Date: Summer 1992, Title: “Vatican Denies Sacred Ancestry of Mt. Graham,” Author: Sal Salemo; Northern Sun News, PO Box 581487, Minneapolis, MN 55458-1487, Date: Fall 1992, Title: “Native American Sacred Lands in Crisis,” Author: Sal Salemo; National Catholic Reporter, 115 E. Armour Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64111, Date: June 16, 1989, Title: “Astronomy Versus Red Squirrel on Arizona Sierra,” Author: Tim McCarthy

SSU Censored Researcher: Judy Bailey

SYNOPSIS: While few Americans know about this issue, protesters in Brussels, Belgium, drove a bulldozer to the basilica of Scherpenheuvel to dramatize the fierce battle between Native American Apaches and the University of Arizona (UofA).

The University of Arizona is the lead agency in an international project to build a $200 million observatory on Mount Gra­ham, Arizona, a site considered by the Apaches to be sacred. Partners in the massive UofA project, which reportedly has connections with the Defense Department’s Star Wars effort, include the Max Planck Institute in Germany, the Vatican and Italy’s Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory.

Seven other original partners, such as Harvard University and the Smithsonian Institution, have withdrawn their financial support.

Fighting the project is a coalition of groups including the San Carlos Tribal Council, Friends of Mount Graham, the Apache Survival Coalition, Native Ameri­cans and their supporters.

Mount Graham is host to varied plants, insects and animals found only in this 615­acre national forest. The Apaches have used the site for hundreds of years for worship and burials and as a source for herbal medicines. In 1988, Congress ap­proved a rider to the Arizona-Idaho Con­servation Act exempting UofA from the National Environmental Act without pub­lic hearings or debate. An appeal to Con­gress resulted in exemption for the project from the Endangered Species Act and the National Forest Act.

Ignoring the history of the site and its extensive documentation, Father Coyne, S.J., director of the Vatican Observatory, cites the lack of title, written records and burial grounds as evidence the site is not sacred, and said that he “cannot find any authentic Apaches that consider the moun­tain holy.” He adds, “This land is a gift from God to be used with reason and to be respected. We believe our responsible and legitimate use enhances its spiritual char­acter.” He denied the project’s involve­ment with SDI research and funding.

One UofA anthropologist, Elizabeth Brandt, says “sacred sites are hard to record, but I have worked in this area for 20 years and I’ve never seen so much evidence detailing a sacred site.” Despite the massive effort against the project, investigative reporter Sal Salerno warns, “The powerful collusion of science, the military, the church and industry con­tinues to trample on the rights of Native American people.” Ironically, the center­piece telescope for the observatory is named the “Columbus Project.”

Though this story was first nominated in 1992, an earlier article on the issue (see the following “Comments” section) ap­peared in the June 16, 1989, issue of the National CatholicReporter, written by Tim McCarthy, NCR foreign news editor.

Despite the numerous intriguing na­tional and international aspects to this story and the fact that it is a cause celebre in Europe, America’s mainstream media have yet to put it on the national agenda. The media’s spotlight on Mount Graham might help illuminate the conflict between an American university and Native Ameri­cans.

 COMMENTS: The failure of America’s news media to cover this story defies logic. It has nearly all the ingredients the press could want in a “big story”-international intrigue, a major U.S. university versus environmentalists, Native American reli­gious rights versus the Pope, an interesting mountain-top setting and even the De­fense Department’s exotic Star Wars Pro­gram! Although these ingredients have attracted major international media atten­tion, they have failed to interest much of the U.S. mainstream media.

Jennifer Rathaus and Sal Salerno, two of the investigative authors who have ex­plored the issue, comment on this enigma and other issues involved in the Mount Graham Observatory story: “National news coverage of the Mount Graham Observa­tory has been insufficient in that it has consistently neglected the group most di­rectly affected by the project, the San Carlos Apaches,” says Jennifer Rathaus. “The New York Times and Wall Street Journal ran a few stories about opposition to the observatory because of the threat it posed to the endangered red squirrel and other potential environmental hazards.

“Only local Arizona and Native American newspapers have focused on the threat that the observatory poses to the San Carlos Apaches’ sacred site and the implications it would have for them.

“In order to obtain permission to build the observatory, the University of Arizona, the Vatican and a few local politicians were able to circumvent, without public approval or knowledge, such laws as the Endangered Species Act, the National His­toric Preservation Act and the American Indian Religious Freedom Act. Federal Agencies were pressured to accept hasty and flawed biological studies, and legisla­tion was passed to exempt the project from environmental laws.

“The way in which the project has proceeded without appropriate legal regu­lation and with little public exposure sets a damaging precedent for future misuse of federal lands. Construction of the Mount Graham Observatory is a violation of Na­tive American religious and cultural prac­tices, and it also has serious ecological ramifications. Wider exposure of this sub­ject can help give the general public an understanding, and perhaps an empathy for Native peoples whose religious free­dom is being obstructed. If the San Carlos Apaches’ constitutional rights are being violated, all Americans are threatened.

Facebook Comments