Connect With Us

Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.

6. U.S. Army Quietly Resumes Biowarfare Testing After Ten-Year Hiatus Ten-year

Sources: THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE Dates: 1/27/93, 7/28/93, Titles: “Army Resumes Biological ­Agent Tests At Dugway After 10­Year Cessation;” “Dugway to test disease-causing agents at remote lab,” Author: Jim Woolf, Date: 9/21/93, Title: “Dugway Base Cited for 22 Waste Violations,” Author: Laurie Sullivan; HIGH COUNTRY NEWS, Date: 8/9/93, Title: “Blowarfare is back,” Author: Jon Christensen; HIGH DESERT ADVOCATE, Date: 9/15/93, Title: “Utah biowarfare oversight group wants to do its work behind closed doors”

SYNOPSIS: Although few people outside of Dugway, Utah, are aware of it, the U.S. Army has brought bio­logical warfare testing back to a site it declared unsafe a decade earlier.

Ten years ago, residents of western Utah breathed a healthy sigh of relief when the Army dis­continued testing biological warfare agents at its Dugway Proving Ground. The reason given was that the Army’s testing facility was get­ting old, and its safety-its ability to prevent potentially deadly dis­eases from escaping into the air outside the facility and thence to the rest of the world-could no longer be guaranteed. Now the deadly bugs are back.

Military scientists are testing a device called the Biological Integrated Detection System (BIDS) at the renovated Dugway facility. BIDS is described as a defensive weapon, designed to detect the presence of biological agents in time to allow soldiers to put on protective clothing.

A Dugway representative said the tests, which include organisms such as anthrax, botulism, and the plague, would initially be liquid, not aerosol, tests. Aerosol tests are the most hazardous form of testing because they involve spraying bio­logical agents into the air inside a sealed chamber. One tiny air leak could result in a catastrophic release of deadly diseases. It was precisely this hazard that led to the closing of the Dugway facility in 1983. The biowarfare lab has been renovated since then and Army experts claim their elaborate safety precautions will prevent such a leak.

Nonetheless, new safety con­cerns were raised in September 1993, when the Dugway Proving Ground was cited for 22 violations of state hazardous-waste regula­tions, ranging from inadequate record-keeping to improper dumping of poisonous chemicals. Notices of violation and orders for compliance were issued to the Army base by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality.

Critics also point out that it was the Army that denied for a year that it was responsible for the 1968 accidental release of nerve gas from Dugway that killed some 6,000 sheep in the area.

Finally, public information about what was happening at Dugway suffered a serious setback in September 1993, when the biowar­fare oversight committee that advises the governor of Utah on biological defense testing matters at Dugway voted to make itself off ­limits to the public. Reasoning that they could obtain more informa­tion from the Army if confiden­tiality could be assured, the oversight group also voted to disen­gage from its parent organization, the State Advisory Council on Science and Technology. The com­mittee had been frustrated by its inability to get timely information from Dugway.

Critics doubt the committee will have access to any more information than it has received in the past and that the net result only further dis­tances the Army from accountability and the public from the truth.

SSU Censored Researcher: Jesse Boggs

COMMENTS: Jim Woolf, envi­ronmental writer for The Salt Lake Tribune, said he was surprised by the lack of attention this story gen­erated. “It was treated as a local story that had little significance to the general public,” Woolf said, adding, “I disagree.”

Woolf felt the general public should know more about this story for at least three reasons:

“1. This is an important local story. Military scientists near my home are conducting tests with some of the most deadly disease causing organisms and natural toxins ever identified. What if some of these `bugs’ escape into the environment or are carried by workers into my community? Are local doctors trained to recognize and deal with this threat? Has the Army taken all prudent steps to reduce the risk? Has the public been told the full scope of testing being carried out by the Army?

“2. Biological and chemical weapons have been described as the `poor man’s atomic bomb.’ They are relatively easy to produce and could have devastating conse­quences in battle. Several of our enemies are known or suspected to have these weapons. All announced testing at Dugway focuses on devel­oping systems to protect American troops from these weapons. (The development or testing of OFFEN­SIVE biological or chemical systems is prohibited under inter­national treaties.) Work in this field would be of general interest to mili­tary families and. others who may feel threatened by this category of weapon.

“3. The resumption of testing and plans to build an, upgraded research laboratory at Dugway­ could have important conse­quences for America’s international relations. Critics claim there is no clear line dividing defensive from offensive testing — the scientific knowledge gained at Dugway can be used for either good or bad. Does the resumption of this testing send a message to other countries that the United States is interested in biochem warfare? Will it prompt other countries to upgrade their test facilities and lead to an escalation in the race to produce ever-more-deadly weapons?”

Woolf felt that the interests of several groups were served by the limited coverage given the resump­tion of biowarfare testing.

“The Army was pleased. Military scientists want freedom to study whatever they want, no matter how dangerous or far-fetched the poten­tial threat may be. The last thing they want are questions from the public or elected officials.

“Congress was served because members were not required to con­front another potentially controver­sial issue. A handful of members interested in military issues are responsible for most of the funding decisions in this area. If there is no controversy, no one else has to con­front the difficult questions sur­rounding this topic.

“Certain economic interests in Utah and elsewhere were served. Dugway provides jobs in a remote area of the state. If biological testing were eliminated or scaled back, the Army would have fewer reasons to maintain the base. Also, handful of companies are devel­oping products and services related to biological-defense. None would like to see their income potential reduced.”

Woolf notes that the resumption of biological testing has been a dif­ficult issue in Utah and concludes with a chilling question.

“The presence of these deadly agents so close to our community is a source of concern, but we watched on CNN the terror in Israel during the Iraq war when no one knew whether the bombs that were falling contained chemical or biological weapons. We understand the need to improve our defenses, but wonder why it has to be done in our backyard, whether there are safer alternatives, and whether all safety precautions have been taken.

“We’re also frightened that the Army may not be telling the whole truth — that in times of emergency they will cover their operations with the national security veil and do whatever they think is right, regardless of the threat to their neighbors. Utahns learned this lesson living downwind from the nuclear-weapons tests at the Nevada Test Site.

“Will the clouds of radioactive material be followed by the plague?”

Jon Christensen, Great Basin Regional Editor for the High Country News, agreed that there hasn’t been sufficient coverage of this issue. “The only papers to cover the story adequately were The Salt Lake Tribune and the High Desert Advocate, in Wendover, Nevada.” Without their coverage, Christensen felt that we all might have missed this story about the resumption of biowarfare testing at Dugway, Utah. He feels it is impor­tant for people to know about this issue since they “might better understand the domestic costs and risks of preparing for war, many of which are borne by remote, rural Western communities (among others). Also, our stockpile of dan­gerous chemical weapons and bio­logical agents must be stored and destroyed safely. The public needs to know how” Christensen empha­sized that “The regional media deserve credit for following this story. Without them, we would all be in the dark about this.”

Facebook Comments