Connect With Us

“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite

9. The Pentagon’s Mysterious HAARP Project

Source: EARTH ISLAND JOURNAL, Date: Fall 1994, Title: “Project HAARP: The Military’s Plan to Alter the Ionosphere,” Authors: Clare Zickuhr and Gar Smith

SYNOPSIS: The Pentagon’s mys­terious HAARP project, now under construction at an isolated Air Force facility near Gakona, Alaska, marks the first step toward creating the world’s most powerful “ionos­pheric heater.” The High Frequency Active Aurora] Research Project (HAARP), a joint effort of the Air Force and the Navy, is the latest in a series of little-known Department of Defense (DOD) “active ionospheric experiments.”

Internal HAARP documents state: “From a DOD point of view, the most exciting and challenging” part of the experiment is “its poten­tial to control ionospheric processes” for military objectives. Scientists envision using the system’s powerful 2.8-10 megahertz (MHz) beam to burn “holes” in the ionosphere and “create an artificial lens” in the sky that could focus large bursts of elec­tromagnetic energy “to higher alti­tudes … than is presently possible.” The minimum area to be heated would be 31 miles in diameter.

The initial $26 million, 320 kw HAARP project will employ 360 72­foot-tall antennas spread over four acres to direct an intense beam of focused electromagnetic energy upwards to strike the ionosphere. The next stage of the project would expand HAARP’s power to 1.7 gigawatts (1.7 billion watts), making it the most powerful such transmitter on Earth.

For a project whose backers hail it as a major scientific feat, HAARP has remained extremely low-pro­file-almost unknown to most Alaskans, and the rest of the country. HAARP surfaced publicly in Alaska in the spring of 1993, when the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) began advising commercial pilots on how to avoid the large amount of inten­tional (and some unintentional) electromagnetic radiation that HAARP would generate. Despite protests of FAA engineers and Alaska bush pilots, the final Environmental Impact Statement gave HAARP the green light.

While a November 1993 “HAARP Fact Sheet” released to the public by the Office of Naval Research stressed only the civilian and scientific aspects of the project, an earlier, 1990, Air Force-Navy doc­ument, acquired by Earth Island . Journal, listed only military experi­ments for the HAARP project.

Scientists, environmentalists, and native people are concerned that HAARP’s electronic transmit­ters could harm people, endanger wildlife, and trigger unforeseen environmental impacts.

Inupiat tribal advisor Charles Etok Edwardsen, Jr., wrote President Clinton on behalf of the Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope and the Kasigluk Elders Conference expressing their concern with the prospect of altering the earth’s neu­tral atmospheric properties.

HAARP also may violate the 1977 Environmental Modification Convention (ratified by the U.S. in 1979), which bans “military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting, or severe effects.”

HAARP project manager John Heckscher, a scientist at the Air Force’s Phillips Laboratory, has called concerns about the trans­mitter’s impact unfounded. “It’s not unreasonable to expect that something three times more pow­erful than anything that’s previously been built might have unforeseen effects,” Heckscher told Microwave News. “But that’s why we do envi­ronmental impact statements.”

COMMENTS: Co-author Gar Smith said that to his knowledge, “there has been absolutely no cov­erage of Project HAARP and its implications in the mainstream media. The only report that I am aware of was an exchange of letters in Physics and Society and an article in Microwave News. I had written an article on the Eastlund patents in Earth Island Journal in 1988, the same year that OMNI magazine ran an article on Eastlund’s work. As far as I know, there has been no cov­erage of this story in the environ­mental press. Given the nature of the proposed experiment and the covert-defense-related implications of the project, I believe that Project HAARP deserves a full and thor­ough public debate.”

Smith said the public should be aware of Project HAARP since, as taxpayers, they have already paid for the demonstration phase of the pro­ject and will be footing the bill for the costly, vastly expanded version of the ionospheric transmitter. “Perhaps of greater importance, is the possibility that HAARP may expose nearby human populations to health and safety hazards and­ given the planet-wide nature of an experiment that would interact with the Earth’s ionosphere and mag­netic fields-potential risks to the entire planet. I believe the public should be entitled to determine the real purposes of HAARP, the pos­sible risks, and the process by which this proposal was promoted.”

The limited amount of coverage given the issue tends to benefit the Navy and Air Force scientists who are involved in Project HAARP and would rather conduct their research without undue interference. Also, says Smith, Pentagon strategic planners are clearly interested in the “secret agenda” behind the public face of HAARP — i.e. “trig­gering ionospheric processes that potentially could be exploited for DOD purposes.” Smith added that the ARCO oil company and its sub­sidiaries are involved in the project to various degrees.

Gar Smith, co-author of the article and editor of Earth Island Journal, said that one of the biggest obstacles he had to overcome to get the article published was his own staff. “Both the assistant editor and managing editor insisted that the article should not be considered for publication because HAARP had ,no environmental impact’ and the article, by its nature, was `too jar­gony’ to be understood by the average reader. This served to demonstrate a critical problem that stymies environmental criticism: without `positive proof’ of a harmful impact, some people argue, it is irresponsible to specu­late on potential hazards. This, of course, is the technique that Rush Limbaugh uses so effectively to dis­miss claims of `global warming.’ “Non-experts are not supposed to ask questions concerning rar­efied scientific matters. As my managing editor put it, being con­cerned about the possible environ­mental impact of HAARP was tantamount to being concerned about the impacts of `farting into the wind.’ I consoled myself with the thought that, had more non-­experts asked more questions about CFC gases, we might still have an intact ozone shield.

“I was struck by the argument of HAARP’s scientists that heating the ionosphere and altering the region’s electron densities should not be a matter of concern because the energy released by HAARP was `insignificant’ when compared to the energy pouring into the magne­tosphere from the sun. This is another logical fallacy favored by Rush Limbaugh, who has argued that there is no reason to be alarmed by the release of man­made atmospheric gases because volcanoes release much larger vol­umes of similar vapors. This is something like advising jaywalking pedestrians that they needn’t worry about being hit by motorcycles because, compared to being run down by a Sherman tank, the con­sequences would be `insignificant.’

“When I attempted to obtain a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) from the regional EPA, I was told that I would have to go `to Seattle or Alaska to see it.’ Project HAARP officials were diffi­cult to locate. It required two hours and a dozen misdirected calls to establish contact. Several attempts were made to obtain the HIS from HAARP officials.

“The documents didn’t arrive until after the article deadline had passed. In order to complete the article, I haunted the local libraries to educate myself about the Earth’s geomagnetic fields, trolled a variety of scientific conferences on com­puter networks, and called a dozen scientists for comment.

“I was able to contact a number of correspondents in the U.S. (and one as far away as Australia) who were lay-experts in electromagnetic phenomenon. They provided useful commentary and suggestions.

“Lacking the FEIS, I was able to draw from my own clipping and document files and from an article on the PAVE PAWS radar that I had written for New West magazine many years ago. Library research suggested that the frequency and power range of the proposed HAARP transmitter would be com­parable to the PAVE PAWS radar. Using this information, I was able to extrapolate a number of poten­tial harmful effects that might be expected from the operation of the HAARP transmitter. When the HIS finally arrived, I was pleased to see that these issues were, in fact, cited as problems that were expected to accompany the activa­tion of Project HAARP

“I sent drafts of the developing article to scientists at the American Federation of Scientists, Union of Concerned Scientists, NOAH, and the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. I also sent copies of the article to leading environmental writers, including Dr. Steven Schneider, David Suzuki and Paul and Anne Ehrlich. Everyone contacted has expressed concern about the project but pro­fessed ignorance about the nature of ionospheric experiments.

“A copy of the magazine reached the desk of Ryan Ross of the Washington, DC-based Environ­mental News Service. I have spoken with Ross and shared information. Ross hopes to produce an article based on the journal’s initial disclo­sures.

“At the same time copies of the articles were being sent to scientists for comment, I was engaged in a parallel campaign to get the atten­tion of members of Congress. Copies of the article were faxed to Washington and copies of the mag­azine were sent in the mail. The hope was that a public debate might take place before an expect­ed vote on full funding of the 1.7 billion-watt transmitter.

“Finally, in late November, I suc­ceeded in reaching Lee Halterman, Rep. Ron Dellums’ (D-CA) aide, at the House Armed Services Committee in Washington. After a flurry of faxes and a telephone con­versation, I received a faxed copy of a letter sent by Rep. Dellums to the Pentagon’s Deputy Under Secretary for Environmental Affairs request­ing a halt to the planned “test’ of the HAARP demonstration trans­mitter on December l.”

The planned “test” of HAARP did not occur on December 1, nor was it known when the test might take place; it seems that no money had been budgeted for the test.

Facebook Comments